<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mark to Market - Latest Comments in The New Crisis of Confidence</title><link>http://marktomarket.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://marktomarket.disqus.com/the_new_crisis_of_confidence/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:45:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The New Crisis of Confidence</title><link>http://reiboldt.com/?p=281#comment-4422411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Consumer and investor confidence is definately a leading indicator, so as long as these confidence-killing events keep emerging, we can't expect any real, long-term stability to come back to the markets.  In the meantime, anyone who attempts to argue that we're at the bottom or things are turning is highly suspect.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:45:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Crisis of Confidence</title><link>http://reiboldt.com/?p=281#comment-4419508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like how you point out the continual need to reference a bottom to the market. If confidence was restored in investors and consumers, a lot of the problem would correct itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Banking Investor</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:09:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>